# A blind visitor's legal fight for audio access to the Bayeux Tapestry

**Artwork**:   
**Artist**: Arnaud Quercy  
**Asset**: IDS-RNI0300  
**Serial**: NAN-RDG000253

This is a disability-rights lawsuit over accessibility compliance (audio guides, the Equality Act, damages, museum policy) — a legal-entitlement story that shares surface vocabulary with the framework (senses, audio vs. visual, 'access') but contains no emitter, no codex, no emission or reception event the framework's propositions could confirm, complicate, or refute; engaging it would mean punning on 'ouverture' rather than testing a claim.

## Context

### Declined — `no-purchase` [@source]

### Propositional grid [@p31]

> **Read this grid.** “Not evaluated” does **not** mean the source has nothing to say about that proposition. It means **the reading did not instruct it**. That is not a result, and it counts in no denominator. A silence, by contrast, is a finding: the reading touched the proposition without concluding, or noted its absence itself.

**Not evaluated (37)** — P1, P2, P3, P3a, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10, P11, P12, P13, P14, P14a, P14b, P15, P16, P16a, P17, P18, P18a, P19, P19a, P20, P21, P22, P23, P24, P25, P26, P27, P28, P29, P30, P31

---

*Overall verdict: **DECLINED:no-purchase** — taxonomy of the August 2026 pass, predating the move to relational verdicts. Kept as metadata: the gap between the two forms is data, not residue. This reading’s judgement is in the grid above.*

Reading of 2026-10-01 · model `claude-sonnet-5` · source 6,804 chars · 1 attempt(s)