# A Legal Fight Over Auschwitz Watercolors Erases Roma Victims' Names

**Artwork**:   
**Artist**: Arnaud Quercy  
**Asset**: IDS-RNI0374  
**Serial**: NAN-RDG000326

This is a stub opinion piece about a legal ownership dispute over Holocaust-era watercolors and the erasure of Roma victims' names and dignity from that dispute; the framework's vocabulary (emission, codex, diffraction, ouverture) is built for voluntary artistic creation and reception dynamics, and has no terms for legal custody, genocide memory, or the ethics of honoring murdered victims in a property claim.

## Context

### Declined — `no-purchase` [@source]

### Propositional grid [@p31]

> **Read this grid.** “Not evaluated” does **not** mean the source has nothing to say about that proposition. It means **the reading did not instruct it**. That is not a result, and it counts in no denominator. A silence, by contrast, is a finding: the reading touched the proposition without concluding, or noted its absence itself.

**Not evaluated (37)** — P1, P2, P3, P3a, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10, P11, P12, P13, P14, P14a, P14b, P15, P16, P16a, P17, P18, P18a, P19, P19a, P20, P21, P22, P23, P24, P25, P26, P27, P28, P29, P30, P31

---

*Overall verdict: **DECLINED:no-purchase** — taxonomy of the August 2026 pass, predating the move to relational verdicts. Kept as metadata: the gap between the two forms is data, not residue. This reading’s judgement is in the grid above.*

Reading of 2026-10-28 · model `claude-sonnet-5` · source 3,184 chars · 1 attempt(s)