AQC0262 | NAN-COL000491

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0262

Dancing with the colibri

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0262

The artwork Dancing with the colibri (AQC0262) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2] underwent comprehensive computational analysis [3] on 2025-10-03. Method: k-means clustering with 10 colors extracted. Metrics documented: color distribution, texture analysis, brightness/contrast, spatial patterns.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 1536x2048 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-10-03.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 1D1922 12.7 red-violet very dark gray
2 5294BB 11.9 blue steelblue
3 2B6599 11.2 blue-violet grayish purple
4 223F66 10.9 blue-violet grayish purple
5 8FB2C0 10.5 blue steel gray
6 B0A679 9.7 yellow ochre
7 678188 9.4 blue-green blue gray
8 936F56 8.1 orange dimgray
9 653D35 8.0 red-orange dark brown
10 D0D3CB 7.4 white lightgray
11 F4EBD7 0.3 yellow-orange antiquewhite [Accent]
12 F2F3E2 0.3 yellow-green white [Accent]
13 001053 0.3 violet very dark purple [Accent]
14 C07D93 0.3 red rosybrown [Accent]
15 E6F4EE 0.3 green white [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
blue 22.4
blue-violet 22.2
red-violet 12.7
yellow 9.7
blue-green 9.4
orange 8.1
red-orange 8.0
white 7.4
yellow-orange 0.3
yellow-green 0.3
violet 0.3
red 0.3
green 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
F4EBD7 yellow-orange antiquewhite 11.0
F2F3E2 yellow-green white 8.5
001053 violet very dark purple 47.5
C07D93 red rosybrown 29.0
E6F4EE green white 6.1

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.216
Mean Local Roughness 0.043
Roughness Uniformity 0.027
Edge Density 0.251
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.333
Gradient Variance 0.102
Gradient Smoothness 0.042
Directional Coherence 0.01
Pattern Complexity 0.12
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.634
Spatial Variation 0.086
Texture Consistency 0.877

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.442
Brightness Variance 0.216
Brightness Uniformity 0.511
Brightness Skewness 0.04
Brightness Entropy 7.751
Rms Contrast 0.216
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.804
Mean Local Contrast 0.044
Contrast Uniformity 0.401
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.706
Shadow Percentage 33.22
Midtone Percentage 50.241
Highlight Percentage 16.539
Shadow Clipping 0.012
Highlight Clipping 0.014
Tonal Balance 0.469
Fine Contrast 0.025
Medium Contrast 0.055
Coarse Contrast 0.077
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.326
Edge Contrast 0.333
Contrast Clustering 0.123

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.678
Color Clustering 0.714
Color Transition Smoothness 0.125
Transition Uniformity 0.318
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.007
Mean Saturation 0.469
Saturation Variance 0.055
Low Saturation Ratio 0.261
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.564
High Saturation Ratio 0.176
Saturation Clustering 0.997
Hue Concentration 0.311
Complementary Balance 0.274
Analogous Dominance 0.598
Temperature Bias -0.323

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2021). Dancing with the colibri - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0262.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/09/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

3b305486f081ae02418806109aba4283aae4308b03b69776f9d11f9be046008f

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français