AQC0496 | NAN-COL000436

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0496

I Too Rising Hope

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0496

Computational image analysis of artwork I Too Rising Hope (AQC0496) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3], using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2025-10-03.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 1906x2560 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-10-03.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 636B70 18.0 gray dimgray
2 371B24 17.4 red very dark red
3 452E2D 17.0 red-orange darkslategray
4 9AB8BD 16.4 blue-green steel gray
5 6D787E 11.4 blue blue gray
6 5A433F 5.0 red-orange dark brown
7 DB985C 4.9 orange sandybrown
8 E5BC92 3.7 orange burlywood
9 AF4431 3.6 red-orange burnt sienna
10 51779B 2.5 blue-violet grayish purple
11 EDC842 0.3 yellow-orange sandybrown [Accent]
12 EED651 0.3 yellow sandybrown [Accent]
13 B69CAA 0.3 red-violet steel gray [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
red-orange 25.6
gray 18.0
red 17.4
blue-green 16.4
blue 11.4
orange 8.6
blue-violet 2.5
yellow-orange 0.3
yellow 0.3
red-violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
EDC842 yellow-orange sandybrown 68.0
EED651 yellow sandybrown 66.3
B69CAA red-violet steel gray 12.6

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.204
Mean Local Roughness 0.01
Roughness Uniformity 0.015
Edge Density 0.031
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.077
Gradient Variance 0.023
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.216
Pattern Complexity 0.114
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.613
Spatial Variation 0.157
Texture Consistency 0.394

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.401
Brightness Variance 0.204
Brightness Uniformity 0.492
Brightness Skewness 0.315
Brightness Entropy 6.974
Rms Contrast 0.204
Michelson Contrast 0.969
Weber Contrast 0.788
Mean Local Contrast 0.011
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 0.973
Effective Dynamic Range 0.588
Shadow Percentage 39.332
Midtone Percentage 41.237
Highlight Percentage 19.431
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.006
Medium Contrast 0.013
Coarse Contrast None
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 1.0
Edge Contrast 0.077
Contrast Clustering 0.606

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.765
Color Clustering 0.619
Color Transition Smoothness 0.784
Transition Uniformity 0.84
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.222
Mean Saturation 0.316
Saturation Variance 0.034
Low Saturation Ratio 0.516
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.454
High Saturation Ratio 0.03
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.628
Complementary Balance 0.169
Analogous Dominance 0.823
Temperature Bias 0.661

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2023). I Too Rising Hope - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0496.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/09/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

83924347e7ebd67722254ccad3cdd971f34b933fb789f47c130cd679a16625a6

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français