AQC0629 | NAN-COL000317

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0629

Eb minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 1

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0629

Computational image analysis of artwork Eb minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 1 (AQC0629) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3], using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2025-10-03.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 2229x3343 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-10-03.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 4C4B5A 17.5 violet dusty mauve
2 3B3A47 16.2 violet dusty mauve
3 656D9F 15.8 violet dusty mauve
4 7B83AE 14.4 violet dusty mauve
5 78CC6B 11.3 yellow-green darkseagreen
6 201C13 9.2 yellow-orange very dark gray
7 656773 7.7 violet dusty mauve
8 989FC7 5.5 violet steel gray
9 E0E8DF 1.9 yellow-green white
10 D2A058 0.5 yellow-orange sandybrown
11 C0A38B 0.3 orange rosybrown [Accent]
12 B3AF9F 0.3 yellow steel gray [Accent]
13 B88783 0.3 red-orange rosybrown [Accent]
14 81A799 0.3 green darkseagreen [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
violet 77.1
yellow-green 13.2
yellow-orange 9.7
orange 0.3
yellow 0.3
red-orange 0.3
green 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
C0A38B orange rosybrown 17.5
B3AF9F yellow steel gray 9.1
B88783 red-orange rosybrown 20.6
81A799 green darkseagreen 16.3

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.185
Mean Local Roughness 0.036
Roughness Uniformity 0.032
Edge Density 0.18
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.297
Gradient Variance 0.122
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.008
Pattern Complexity 0.115
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.636
Spatial Variation 0.123
Texture Consistency 0.668

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.409
Brightness Variance 0.185
Brightness Uniformity 0.549
Brightness Skewness 0.317
Brightness Entropy 7.471
Rms Contrast 0.185
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.71
Mean Local Contrast 0.039
Contrast Uniformity 0.225
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.588
Shadow Percentage 39.649
Midtone Percentage 50.586
Highlight Percentage 9.766
Shadow Clipping 0.032
Highlight Clipping 0.037
Tonal Balance 0.161
Fine Contrast 0.019
Medium Contrast 0.05
Coarse Contrast 0.081
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.24
Edge Contrast 0.297
Contrast Clustering 0.332

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.707
Color Clustering 0.752
Color Transition Smoothness 0.209
Transition Uniformity 0.179
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.009
Mean Saturation 0.31
Saturation Variance 0.022
Low Saturation Ratio 0.514
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.467
High Saturation Ratio 0.018
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.474
Complementary Balance 0.132
Analogous Dominance 0.704
Temperature Bias -0.259

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2024). Eb minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 1 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0629.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/09/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

7a4b3b574392a5d77b436b8e10414b42f4af40f2e428ba6f0dbaaa010c145cf0

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français