AQC0864 | NAN-COL000003

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0864

G Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 10

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0864

Computational analysis of the photograph of the artwork G Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 10 (AQC0864) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3], on an image 1000 pixels on its longer side, on 2025-10-03. Each colour is located in the Munsell system and named according to the ISCC-NBS system (267 names, National Bureau of Standards, 1976). The image divides into 20 flat areas. The largest are strong orange (30%), moderate reddish orange (23%) and vivid reddish orange (22%). Among the others, those that stand out most sharply from their surroundings are grayish olive at the top right (0.3%), pale orange yellow at the top (1.3%) and dark brown at the top (1.6%). By colour name family: orange 90%, brown 4.5%, orange yellow 2.4% and red 1.3%.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3]: (a) colours named by Munsell and ISCC-NBS, areas and flat areas, (b) texture, (c) brightness and contrast, (d) spatial distribution. Source image: 2245x2993 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-10-03.

A) Color Analysis

Flat areas

Ranked by contrast with their surroundings (CIEDE2000). Strokes thinner than 10 pixels are excluded (1).

Rank Colour ISCC-NBS name Munsell Area Contrast Position
1 4E4136 grayish olive 4.0Y 2.9/1.7 0.3% 45.2 at the top right
2 F1C98F pale orange yellow 0.4Y 8.4/5.6 1.3% 38.8 at the top
3 503320 dark brown 5.0YR 2.5/3.4 1.6% 38.2 at the top
4 4A2D1A dark brown 5.0YR 2.1/3.6 0.5% 35.6 at the bottom left
5 6A5140 grayish brown 6.6YR 3.7/2.4 0.2% 34.0 on the right
6 5A3B26 moderate brown 6.9YR 2.8/3.8 1.2% 28.4 in the centre
7 EC9039 strong orange 5.7YR 6.8/10.7 30% 26.2 on the right
8 E46408 vivid reddish orange 1.6YR 5.7/14.0 22% 18.8 at the top left
9 B17053 grayish reddish orange 2.7YR 5.4/6.3 0.1% 16.9 on the right
10 674D5F dark grayish purple 1.5RP 3.5/2.7 1.0% 16.5 on the right
11 ED9441 strong orange 5.3YR 6.8/10.3 13% 16.2 at the bottom left
12 8E5C56 moderate reddish brown 8.4R 4.3/4.1 1.3% 13.7 on the right
13 EE9037 strong orange 6.1YR 6.8/11.1 0.5% 11.6 at the top
14 995F50 grayish red 7.4R 4.5/5.7 0.8% 10.6 on the right
15 BB7C58 grayish reddish orange 2.7YR 5.7/6.2 0.1% 9.2 on the right
16 B6704C brownish orange 4.0YR 5.4/6.6 1.9% 7.7 on the right
17 9F4833 dark reddish orange 0.4YR 4.1/7.8 0.2% 6.8 at the bottom
18 BB6546 moderate reddish orange 0.6YR 5.1/8.5 23% 6.0 at the bottom
19 A4482E dark reddish orange 0.9YR 4.2/8.9 0.1% 2.6 in the centre
20 A4482B dark reddish orange 0.9YR 4.2/8.9 0.3% 2.2 on the left

Colour name families

Family Area
orange 90%
brown 4.5%
orange yellow 2.4%
red 1.3%
purple 0.7%

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.111
Mean Local Roughness 0.01
Roughness Uniformity 0.011
Edge Density 0.033
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.096
Gradient Variance 0.015
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.021
Pattern Complexity 0.112
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.599
Spatial Variation 0.057
Texture Consistency 0.699

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.547
Brightness Variance 0.111
Brightness Uniformity 0.797
Brightness Skewness -0.683
Brightness Entropy 6.646
Rms Contrast 0.111
Michelson Contrast 0.93
Weber Contrast 0.371
Mean Local Contrast 0.012
Contrast Uniformity 0.052
Dynamic Range 0.941
Effective Dynamic Range 0.325
Shadow Percentage 3.99
Midtone Percentage 85.325
Highlight Percentage 10.685
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.005
Medium Contrast 0.015
Coarse Contrast 0.025
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.211
Edge Contrast 0.096
Contrast Clustering 0.301

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.755
Color Clustering 0.373
Color Transition Smoothness 0.754
Transition Uniformity 0.898
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.029
Mean Saturation 0.74
Saturation Variance 0.026
Low Saturation Ratio 0.015
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.371
High Saturation Ratio 0.614
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.988
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.996
Temperature Bias 0.998

Methodology

Computational analysis of a photograph of the artwork, reduced to 1,000 pixels on its longer side and filtered by a 3×3 median to remove grain. Colours: each pixel (sRGB rounded to 5 bits per channel) receives its Munsell notation and ISCC-NBS name from a table computed once from published data (Munsell renotation; ISCC-NBS blocks, NBS Special Publication 440, 1976), never from the artworks. Flat areas: connected regions of one name, merged with their neighbours while the CIEDE2000 difference between their mean colours stays below 10; an area is kept from 0.05% of the image; contrast with the surroundings measured 4 to 12 pixels from the edge. Texture: intensity standard deviation, local standard deviation, edge density (Canny), local binary patterns. Brightness: mean, variance, RMS, Michelson and local contrast, shadow / midtone / highlight distribution. Distribution: spatial coherence, transitions, saturation. Methods are deterministic and reproducible. Limits: the measurement concerns the photograph, including its lighting and white balance; two neighbouring areas less than 10 apart are merged.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2025). G Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 10 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0864.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/11/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

6685554604964ea8c6aadf36110ddfae22733890f8574eecabf52c6c3c724504

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français