AQC0926 | NAN-COL000043

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0926

G Octaves - Research on Harmony - Reflections 40

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0926

The artwork G Octaves - Research on Harmony - Reflections 40 (AQC0926) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2] underwent comprehensive computational analysis [3] on 2025-12-11. Method: k-means clustering with 10 colors extracted. Metrics documented: color distribution, texture analysis, brightness/contrast, spatial patterns.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 1943x2915 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-11.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 DB9E6A 16.1 orange darksalmon
2 E77D12 15.1 orange chocolate
3 D0BDA3 14.5 yellow-orange tan
4 242122 12.2 gray very dark gray
5 C1AE91 12.0 yellow-orange rosybrown
6 EBB382 9.8 orange burlywood
7 E2D5C0 8.3 yellow-orange lightgray
8 F09332 7.0 orange goldenrod
9 DD6137 4.1 orange tomato
10 6A5040 1.1 orange dark brown
11 652112 0.3 red-orange maroon [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 53.1
yellow-orange 34.7
gray 12.2
red-orange 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
652112 red-orange maroon 39.7

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.202
Mean Local Roughness 0.024
Roughness Uniformity 0.019
Edge Density 0.114
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.19
Gradient Variance 0.051
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.002
Pattern Complexity 0.121
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.642
Spatial Variation 0.127
Texture Consistency 0.521

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.615
Brightness Variance 0.202
Brightness Uniformity 0.672
Brightness Skewness -1.467
Brightness Entropy 6.991
Rms Contrast 0.202
Michelson Contrast 0.992
Weber Contrast 0.783
Mean Local Contrast 0.027
Contrast Uniformity 0.193
Dynamic Range 0.988
Effective Dynamic Range 0.71
Shadow Percentage 12.756
Midtone Percentage 32.711
Highlight Percentage 54.533
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.013
Medium Contrast 0.032
Coarse Contrast 0.043
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.294
Edge Contrast 0.19
Contrast Clustering 0.479

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.751
Color Clustering 0.392
Color Transition Smoothness 0.525
Transition Uniformity 0.659
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.003
Mean Saturation 0.445
Saturation Variance 0.083
Low Saturation Ratio 0.448
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.296
High Saturation Ratio 0.256
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.991
Complementary Balance 0.002
Analogous Dominance 0.997
Temperature Bias 0.996

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2025). G Octaves - Research on Harmony - Reflections 40 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0926.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/09/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

beb3214a53a6fe6472f33b3795638b4924579d3e8bb9b0f99287736387bc00dd

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français