AQC1067 | NAN-COL000630

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC1067

Watercolor Study in A Minor No. 1

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC1067

Analysis record: Watercolor Study in A Minor No. 1 (AQC1067) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], per IDS-CMP-2025 [3]. Method: k-means. Parameters: 10 colors. Metrics: color distribution, texture, brightness, spatial patterns. Completed: 2026-07-13.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 1771x1771 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-07-13.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 A48D60 23.7 yellow-orange gray
2 AB9569 16.1 yellow-orange ochre
3 78603B 15.8 yellow-orange dark brown
4 9D8556 12.8 yellow-orange grey
5 6F552F 11.4 yellow-orange dark brown
6 876D47 6.8 yellow-orange burnt sienna
7 7E2603 6.7 orange russet
8 8A552C 2.9 orange burnt sienna
9 0B0502 2.6 black black
10 513917 1.2 orange dark brown

Color Families:

Family %
yellow-orange 86.6
orange 10.8
black 2.6

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.133
Mean Local Roughness 0.017
Roughness Uniformity 0.012
Edge Density 0.01
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.116
Gradient Variance 0.023
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.007
Pattern Complexity 0.139
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.62
Spatial Variation 0.089
Texture Consistency 0.44

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.459
Brightness Variance 0.133
Brightness Uniformity 0.711
Brightness Skewness -1.094
Brightness Entropy 6.433
Rms Contrast 0.133
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.513
Mean Local Contrast 0.016
Contrast Uniformity 0.201
Dynamic Range 0.788
Effective Dynamic Range 0.38
Shadow Percentage 12.609
Midtone Percentage 87.366
Highlight Percentage 0.025
Shadow Clipping 0.014
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.011
Medium Contrast 0.02
Coarse Contrast 0.028
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.4
Edge Contrast 0.116
Contrast Clustering 0.56

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.733
Color Clustering 0.507
Color Transition Smoothness 0.696
Transition Uniformity 0.826
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.006
Mean Saturation 0.508
Saturation Variance 0.027
Low Saturation Ratio 0.007
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.892
High Saturation Ratio 0.1
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.99
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.996
Temperature Bias 0.996

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2026). Watercolor Study in A Minor No. 1 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC1067.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/09/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

0cffb58fd4fc8161a72f09e2cd8d3c01729e49ba343f8a46d33549cd7d29e7c8

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français