AQC1074 | NAN-COL000637

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC1074

Watercolor Study in Eb Maj7 No. 1

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC1074

K-means clustering (10 colors) performed on artwork Watercolor Study in Eb Maj7 No. 1 (AQC1074) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2026-07-13, according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3]. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 1732x2309 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-07-13.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 BE8248 20.4 orange peru
2 C68F59 19.3 orange ochre
3 94718A 16.8 red-violet dusty mauve
4 6C5E7C 9.0 violet dusty mauve
5 CAA17A 9.0 orange tan
6 554E6C 8.0 violet dusty mauve
7 963D09 6.9 orange russet
8 100A0F 4.8 black black
9 272229 3.4 red-violet very dark gray
10 8D5C52 2.3 red-orange burnt sienna
11 263A58 0.3 blue-violet grayish purple [Accent]
12 B28E9A 0.3 red rosybrown [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 55.6
red-violet 20.2
violet 17.0
black 4.8
red-orange 2.3
blue-violet 0.3
red 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
263A58 blue-violet grayish purple 21.2
B28E9A red rosybrown 16.0

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.159
Mean Local Roughness 0.02
Roughness Uniformity 0.015
Edge Density 0.043
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.148
Gradient Variance 0.034
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.003
Pattern Complexity 0.14
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.627
Spatial Variation 0.105
Texture Consistency 0.5

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.475
Brightness Variance 0.159
Brightness Uniformity 0.666
Brightness Skewness -1.136
Brightness Entropy 7.012
Rms Contrast 0.159
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.565
Mean Local Contrast 0.021
Contrast Uniformity 0.182
Dynamic Range 0.843
Effective Dynamic Range 0.561
Shadow Percentage 16.276
Midtone Percentage 79.381
Highlight Percentage 4.344
Shadow Clipping 0.014
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.012
Medium Contrast 0.025
Coarse Contrast 0.035
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.345
Edge Contrast 0.148
Contrast Clustering 0.5

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.73
Color Clustering 0.511
Color Transition Smoothness 0.613
Transition Uniformity 0.741
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.005
Mean Saturation 0.462
Saturation Variance 0.047
Low Saturation Ratio 0.357
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.551
High Saturation Ratio 0.093
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.642
Complementary Balance 0.003
Analogous Dominance 0.687
Temperature Bias 0.783

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2026). Watercolor Study in Eb Maj7 No. 1 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC1074.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/09/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

055e71bc0d015a0a8bd8c5eb7c0a7069a6c931517d7cb80202d3d3a66b3e86db

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français