AQC1088 | NAN-COL000651

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC1088

Watercolor Study in F# Major No. 1

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC1088

Analysis record: Watercolor Study in F# Major No. 1 (AQC1088) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], per IDS-CMP-2025 [3]. Method: k-means. Parameters: 10 colors. Metrics: color distribution, texture, brightness, spatial patterns. Completed: 2026-07-13.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 1674x2396 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-07-13.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 7EA17C 26.5 yellow-green gray
2 739672 19.9 yellow-green grey
3 8BAC88 19.9 yellow-green darkseagreen
4 9DB797 7.1 yellow-green steel gray
5 0D0E0D 6.6 black black
6 1D2120 4.7 gray very dark gray
7 5F445A 4.3 red-violet dusty mauve
8 3D363D 4.3 red-violet dusty mauve
9 316B51 3.7 yellow-green darkslategray
10 477D61 3.0 yellow-green seagreen

Color Families:

Family %
yellow-green 80.0
red-violet 8.6
black 6.6
gray 4.7

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.182
Mean Local Roughness 0.02
Roughness Uniformity 0.015
Edge Density 0.048
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.148
Gradient Variance 0.035
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.002
Pattern Complexity 0.137
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.623
Spatial Variation 0.116
Texture Consistency 0.401

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.488
Brightness Variance 0.182
Brightness Uniformity 0.627
Brightness Skewness -1.29
Brightness Entropy 6.753
Rms Contrast 0.182
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.785
Mean Local Contrast 0.02
Contrast Uniformity 0.159
Dynamic Range 0.89
Effective Dynamic Range 0.596
Shadow Percentage 19.896
Midtone Percentage 75.597
Highlight Percentage 4.507
Shadow Clipping 0.017
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.012
Medium Contrast 0.025
Coarse Contrast 0.035
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.343
Edge Contrast 0.148
Contrast Clustering 0.599

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.729
Color Clustering 0.866
Color Transition Smoothness 0.616
Transition Uniformity 0.734
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.002
Mean Saturation 0.237
Saturation Variance 0.013
Low Saturation Ratio 0.887
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.109
High Saturation Ratio 0.005
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.825
Complementary Balance 0.028
Analogous Dominance 0.912
Temperature Bias -0.258

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2026). Watercolor Study in F# Major No. 1 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC1088.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/09/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

239593d0dbde41eb898778ba670b81feaee3a80ccad8188b5a9d71980353bd71

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français