AQC1090 | NAN-COL000653

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC1090

Watercolor Study in Db Minor No. 1

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC1090

The artwork Watercolor Study in Db Minor No. 1 (AQC1090) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2] underwent comprehensive computational analysis [3] on 2026-07-13. Method: k-means clustering with 10 colors extracted. Metrics documented: color distribution, texture analysis, brightness/contrast, spatial patterns.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 1668x2239 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-07-13.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 C2B270 28.2 yellow ochre
2 BBA862 16.5 yellow-orange ochre
3 CCBC7D 16.4 yellow tan
4 8C8B74 13.3 yellow gray
5 5E6E67 7.3 green dimgray
6 405A5A 6.6 blue-green darkslategray
7 1A342F 5.5 green darkslategrey
8 0B0A06 3.7 black black
9 493C0E 1.3 yellow-orange dark brown
10 C7C3BC 1.1 white silver

Color Families:

Family %
yellow 57.9
yellow-orange 17.8
green 12.9
blue-green 6.6
black 3.7
white 1.1

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.193
Mean Local Roughness 0.018
Roughness Uniformity 0.018
Edge Density 0.051
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.141
Gradient Variance 0.046
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.003
Pattern Complexity 0.138
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.613
Spatial Variation 0.127
Texture Consistency 0.565

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.568
Brightness Variance 0.193
Brightness Uniformity 0.661
Brightness Skewness -1.322
Brightness Entropy 6.83
Rms Contrast 0.193
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.667
Mean Local Contrast 0.02
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 0.875
Effective Dynamic Range 0.6
Shadow Percentage 13.862
Midtone Percentage 37.305
Highlight Percentage 48.834
Shadow Clipping 0.03
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.011
Medium Contrast 0.024
Coarse Contrast 0.036
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.295
Edge Contrast 0.141
Contrast Clustering 0.435

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.758
Color Clustering 0.812
Color Transition Smoothness 0.631
Transition Uniformity 0.658
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.003
Mean Saturation 0.382
Saturation Variance 0.022
Low Saturation Ratio 0.272
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.7
High Saturation Ratio 0.029
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.71
Complementary Balance 0.008
Analogous Dominance 0.809
Temperature Bias 0.609

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2026). Watercolor Study in Db Minor No. 1 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC1090.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/09/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

a49e1877ef5b1de78acb56ba933c7364cad2171116edb9c81f85d163d18eab62

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français