AQC1101

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC1101

Db Major - Research on Harmony - Variations 16

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC1101

Computational image analysis of artwork Db Major - Research on Harmony - Variations 16 (AQC1101) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3], using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-09-26.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 1437x1729 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-09-26.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 E4D0E8 19.3 red-violet gainsboro
2 D5BFDA 16.0 red-violet thistle
3 4B617D 14.9 blue-violet grayish purple
4 FA9986 14.3 red-orange lightsalmon
5 4B5058 10.9 blue-violet grayish purple
6 313740 8.6 blue-violet grayish purple
7 62768F 7.8 blue-violet grayish purple
8 F9F1F3 4.2 white white
9 D1C7B0 3.3 yellow-orange silver
10 BF5F5E 0.8 red-orange indianred
11 744B39 0.3 orange russet [Accent]
12 7D3944 0.3 red burnt sienna [Accent]
13 9C94AC 0.3 violet steel gray [Accent]
14 142028 0.3 blue very dark gray [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
blue-violet 42.2
red-violet 35.3
red-orange 15.1
white 4.2
yellow-orange 3.3
orange 0.3
red 0.3
violet 0.3
blue 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
744B39 orange russet 23.4
7D3944 red burnt sienna 31.8
9C94AC violet steel gray 13.6
142028 blue very dark gray 7.6

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.244
Mean Local Roughness 0.043
Roughness Uniformity 0.03
Edge Density 0.26
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.288
Gradient Variance 0.075
Gradient Smoothness 0.05
Directional Coherence 0.015
Pattern Complexity 0.134
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.729
Spatial Variation 0.21
Texture Consistency 0.413

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.604
Brightness Variance 0.244
Brightness Uniformity 0.597
Brightness Skewness -0.283
Brightness Entropy 7.366
Rms Contrast 0.244
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.683
Mean Local Contrast 0.039
Contrast Uniformity 0.332
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.682
Shadow Percentage 17.798
Midtone Percentage 27.572
Highlight Percentage 54.631
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 1.073
Tonal Balance 0.055
Fine Contrast 0.027
Medium Contrast 0.049
Coarse Contrast None
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 1.0
Edge Contrast 0.288
Contrast Clustering 0.587

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.749
Color Clustering 0.868
Color Transition Smoothness 0.257
Transition Uniformity 0.495
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.014
Mean Saturation 0.241
Saturation Variance 0.026
Low Saturation Ratio 0.625
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.374
High Saturation Ratio 0.002
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.327
Complementary Balance 0.005
Analogous Dominance 0.625
Temperature Bias -0.25

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2026). Db Major - Research on Harmony - Variations 16 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC1101.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/11/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Where this work lives

Documented at

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

63fca17ad89e6839e8e31b6911f07370c066a5f3f70eb04499d724f503d9201b

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français