Nanopublication — The felt texture of moral perception, emotion, judgment, and agency
This is a technical survey of moral phenomenology's subject matter and methodology (Husserlian essence-analysis vs. analytic introspection, moral perception/emotion/judgment/deliberation/agency, and their bearing on metaethics and normative ethics); it contains no emitter, receiver, codex, or artwork, so the ideamorphism framework's claims about diffraction, invariants, and ouverture have no object to grip here.
Declined — no-purchase [1]
Propositional grid [2]
Read this grid. “Not evaluated” does not mean the source has nothing to say about that proposition. It means the reading did not instruct it. That is not a result, and it counts in no denominator. A silence, by contrast, is a finding: the reading touched the proposition without concluding, or noted its absence itself.
Not evaluated (37) — P1, P2, P3, P3a, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10, P11, P12, P13, P14, P14a, P14b, P15, P16, P16a, P17, P18, P18a, P19, P19a, P20, P21, P22, P23, P24, P25, P26, P27, P28, P29, P30, P31
Overall verdict: DECLINED:no-purchase — taxonomy of the August 2026 pass, predating the move to relational verdicts. Kept as metadata: the gap between the two forms is data, not residue. This reading’s judgement is in the grid above.
Reading of 2026-09-25 · model claude-sonnet-5 · source 125,159 chars · 1 attempt(s)
References
- [1] Moral Phenomenology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2026-09-25. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-phenomenology/
- [2] Quercy, A. (2026). The 31 Propositions of Ideamorphism. https://ideamorphism.org/en/publications/2026/03/the-31-propositions-of-ideamorphism.html
Epistemic profile
| Claim type | boundary reading |
|---|---|
| Voice | third person analysis |
| Epistemic status | no purchase |
| Methodology | Boundary-finding lens applied to one source, model claude-sonnet-5, 1 attempt(s), traceability check passed. |
Checksum (SHA-256)
b30faad37cbc02aa4fedced76cd9ae0d17c5629313651fec88732f9d29d7aad6