AQC1135

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC1135

Watercolor Study in Ab Octaves No. 1

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC1135

K-means clustering (10 colors) performed on artwork Watercolor Study in Ab Octaves No. 1 (AQC1135) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2026-10-02, according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3]. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 3024x4032 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-10-02.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 867A74 23.3 orange gray
2 7A6E6B 20.4 red-orange dimgray
3 92897D 14.3 yellow-orange grey
4 A0998A 13.3 yellow-orange rosybrown
5 AEA795 12.3 yellow steel gray
6 696066 6.8 red-violet dusty mauve
7 B8B5A6 6.4 yellow steel gray
8 304962 1.4 blue-violet grayish purple
9 554B42 1.1 orange dark brown
10 0A060B 0.7 black black
11 162151 0.3 violet very dark purple [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
yellow-orange 27.7
orange 24.3
red-orange 20.4
yellow 18.7
red-violet 6.8
blue-violet 1.4
black 0.7
violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
162151 violet very dark purple 34.0

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.108
Mean Local Roughness 0.018
Roughness Uniformity 0.009
Edge Density 0.011
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.108
Gradient Variance 0.014
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.004
Pattern Complexity 0.137
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.647
Spatial Variation 0.076
Texture Consistency 0.74

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.524
Brightness Variance 0.108
Brightness Uniformity 0.795
Brightness Skewness -0.599
Brightness Entropy 6.614
Rms Contrast 0.108
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.38
Mean Local Contrast 0.016
Contrast Uniformity 0.371
Dynamic Range 0.965
Effective Dynamic Range 0.31
Shadow Percentage 2.861
Midtone Percentage 86.004
Highlight Percentage 11.135
Shadow Clipping 0.048
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.013
Medium Contrast 0.02
Coarse Contrast 0.025
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.538
Edge Contrast 0.108
Contrast Clustering 0.26

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.714
Color Clustering 0.83
Color Transition Smoothness 0.721
Transition Uniformity 0.899
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.003
Mean Saturation 0.152
Saturation Variance 0.006
Low Saturation Ratio 0.974
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.02
High Saturation Ratio 0.006
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.401
Complementary Balance 0.086
Analogous Dominance 0.677
Temperature Bias 0.441

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2026). Watercolor Study in Ab Octaves No. 1 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC1135.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/11/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Where this work lives

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

372235147d52d6e483b70e8815153d9627ca0722ca0cf799cd72847ac0d43293

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français