AQC1141

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC1141

F Minor - Research on Harmony - Variations 23

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC1141

Computational image analysis of artwork F Minor - Research on Harmony - Variations 23 (AQC1141) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3], using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-10-02.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (a) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (b) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (c) Brightness and contrast measurements, (d) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image: 3024x4032 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-10-02.

A) Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 D8CAB4 22.9 yellow-orange silver
2 CDBEA6 16.1 yellow-orange tan
3 BCAD95 15.1 yellow-orange steel gray
4 1A1513 10.0 black black
5 4D5767 9.3 blue-violet grayish purple
6 9C9488 7.2 yellow-orange rosybrown
7 0C3563 6.7 blue-violet grayish purple
8 95160A 6.1 red-orange darkred
9 76737D 3.9 violet dusty mauve
10 996E56 2.8 orange burnt sienna
11 482639 0.3 red-violet dusty mauve [Accent]
12 432833 0.3 red dusty mauve [Accent]
13 2C363F 0.3 blue grayish purple [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
yellow-orange 61.3
blue-violet 15.9
black 10.0
red-orange 6.1
violet 3.9
orange 2.8
red-violet 0.3
red 0.3
blue 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
482639 red-violet dusty mauve 18.7
432833 red dusty mauve 15.1
2C363F blue grayish purple 7.3

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.257
Mean Local Roughness 0.015
Roughness Uniformity 0.009
Edge Density 0.023
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.098
Gradient Variance 0.014
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.009
Pattern Complexity 0.135
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.635
Spatial Variation 0.196
Texture Consistency 0.518

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.549
Brightness Variance 0.257
Brightness Uniformity 0.532
Brightness Skewness -0.619
Brightness Entropy 7.261
Rms Contrast 0.257
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.82
Mean Local Contrast 0.015
Contrast Uniformity 0.26
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.725
Shadow Percentage 27.12
Midtone Percentage 21.167
Highlight Percentage 51.713
Shadow Clipping 0.009
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.011
Medium Contrast 0.018
Coarse Contrast 0.022
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.512
Edge Contrast 0.098
Contrast Clustering 0.482

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.794
Color Clustering 0.785
Color Transition Smoothness 0.748
Transition Uniformity 0.903
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.009
Mean Saturation 0.296
Saturation Variance 0.064
Low Saturation Ratio 0.76
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.111
High Saturation Ratio 0.129
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.486
Complementary Balance 0.245
Analogous Dominance 0.75
Temperature Bias 0.504

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Ideamorphic Studies' computational imaging systems.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2026). F Minor - Research on Harmony - Variations 23 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC1141.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/11/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Where this work lives

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

e5801edebe495822471f9320b686afe05629993c1c075baac755de5ffb6a9cc5

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français