AQC0601 | NAN-COL000345

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0601

F# Major - Research on Harmony

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0601

Computational analysis of the photograph of the artwork F# Major - Research on Harmony (AQC0601) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3], on an image 1000 pixels on its longer side, on 2025-10-03. Each colour is located in the Munsell system and named according to the ISCC-NBS system (267 names, National Bureau of Standards, 1976). The image divides into 8 flat areas. The largest are brilliant bluish green (47%), moderate green (19%) and moderate violet (14%). Among the others, those that stand out most sharply from their surroundings are very pale green in the centre (0.4%), dark violet at the bottom right (12%) and light bluish green in the centre (0.7%). By colour name family: green 73%, violet 24% and blue 3.2%.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3]: (a) colours named by Munsell and ISCC-NBS, areas and flat areas, (b) texture, (c) brightness and contrast, (d) spatial distribution. Source image: 2041x2721 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-10-03.

A) Color Analysis

Flat areas

Ranked by contrast with their surroundings (CIEDE2000). Strokes thinner than 10 pixels are excluded (1).

Rank Colour ISCC-NBS name Munsell Area Contrast Position
1 AEC2BE very pale green 1.1BG 7.7/1.6 0.4% 19.4 in the centre
2 42BEAE brilliant bluish green 3.9BG 6.9/7.1 47% 16.1 in the centre
3 524983 moderate violet 9.4PB 3.5/7.3 14% 13.9 at the top right
4 312456 dark violet 0.3P 1.8/6.7 12% 8.8 at the bottom right
5 34816F moderate green 8.1G 4.9/5.7 19% 4.5 at the bottom
6 0F9CA2 light bluish green 9.7BG 5.7/6.8 0.7% 3.6 in the centre
7 7870A7 light violet 0.2P 5.0/6.5 1.0% 3.1 at the top right
8 345F52 moderate bluish green 1.6BG 3.5/3.1 5.5% 2.7 at the bottom

Colour name families

Family Area
green 73%
violet 24%
blue 3.2%

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.162
Mean Local Roughness 0.038
Roughness Uniformity 0.021
Edge Density 0.225
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.284
Gradient Variance 0.052
Gradient Smoothness 0.195
Directional Coherence 0.009
Pattern Complexity 0.164
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.696
Spatial Variation 0.142
Texture Consistency 0.687

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.449
Brightness Variance 0.162
Brightness Uniformity 0.64
Brightness Skewness -0.216
Brightness Entropy 7.263
Rms Contrast 0.162
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.675
Mean Local Contrast 0.044
Contrast Uniformity 0.491
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.506
Shadow Percentage 26.298
Midtone Percentage 66.418
Highlight Percentage 7.284
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.101
Fine Contrast 0.02
Medium Contrast 0.051
Coarse Contrast 0.05
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.394
Edge Contrast 0.284
Contrast Clustering 0.313

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.811
Color Clustering 0.376
Color Transition Smoothness 0.29
Transition Uniformity 0.676
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.009
Mean Saturation 0.605
Saturation Variance 0.025
Low Saturation Ratio 0.009
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.781
High Saturation Ratio 0.21
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.802
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.791
Temperature Bias -0.734

Methodology

Computational analysis of a photograph of the artwork, reduced to 1,000 pixels on its longer side and filtered by a 3×3 median to remove grain. Colours: each pixel (sRGB rounded to 5 bits per channel) receives its Munsell notation and ISCC-NBS name from a table computed once from published data (Munsell renotation; ISCC-NBS blocks, NBS Special Publication 440, 1976), never from the artworks. Flat areas: connected regions of one name, merged with their neighbours while the CIEDE2000 difference between their mean colours stays below 10; an area is kept from 0.05% of the image; contrast with the surroundings measured 4 to 12 pixels from the edge. Texture: intensity standard deviation, local standard deviation, edge density (Canny), local binary patterns. Brightness: mean, variance, RMS, Michelson and local contrast, shadow / midtone / highlight distribution. Distribution: spatial coherence, transitions, saturation. Methods are deterministic and reproducible. Limits: the measurement concerns the photograph, including its lighting and white balance; two neighbouring areas less than 10 apart are merged.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2024). F# Major - Research on Harmony - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0601.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/11/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

4d598f5d17537c9bdc2402eafc6c4fc66cd96b62f759701647b36374d0c7767d

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français