AQC0621 | NAN-COL000325

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0621

C Major - Research on Harmony

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0621

Computational analysis of the photograph of the artwork C Major - Research on Harmony (AQC0621) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3], on an image 1000 pixels on its longer side, on 2025-10-03. Each colour is located in the Munsell system and named according to the ISCC-NBS system (267 names, National Bureau of Standards, 1976). The image divides into 26 flat areas. The largest are strong yellow (26%), vivid red (24%) and vivid reddish orange (11%). Among the others, those that stand out most sharply from their surroundings are dark grayish olive on the right (8.1%), pinkish white in the centre (1.5%) and brownish black in the centre (1.3%). By colour name family: orange 32%, yellow 25%, red 21%, brown 7.4%, olive 5.4%, gray 1.9%, olive black 1.5%, orange yellow 1.4%, white 1.3% and black 1.1%.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3]: (a) colours named by Munsell and ISCC-NBS, areas and flat areas, (b) texture, (c) brightness and contrast, (d) spatial distribution. Source image: 2372x3558 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-10-03.

A) Color Analysis

Flat areas

Ranked by contrast with their surroundings (CIEDE2000). Strokes thinner than 10 pixels are excluded (15).

Rank Colour ISCC-NBS name Munsell Area Contrast Position
1 2F2D25 dark grayish olive 0.6GY 1.7/0.9 8.1% 44.2 on the right
2 E8E6E3 pinkish white 2.1R 9.1/1.0 1.5% 43.4 in the centre
3 1C130E brownish black 0.9Y 0.7/0.8 1.3% 42.1 in the centre
4 646965 dark greenish gray 0.3G 4.4/0.9 0.3% 41.3 at the top left
5 35291E dark grayish olive 4.3Y 1.8/1.8 0.2% 39.3 at the top right
6 706E6D reddish gray 3.6R 4.5/0.7 0.4% 28.1 at the top right
7 802D33 dark red 4.6R 3.1/7.9 2.1% 26.5 on the left
8 E3C636 strong yellow 4.9Y 7.9/9.9 26% 26.0 at the top left
9 ED662C vivid reddish orange 0.2YR 5.8/13.6 0.4% 24.2 on the right
10 E6601F vivid reddish orange 1.2YR 5.7/13.6 11% 22.9 at the top right
11 5D5B5D dark gray N 3.8/ 1.3% 20.3 in the centre
12 C97B30 moderate orange 5.4YR 5.8/9.5 0.8% 13.1 in the centre
13 C0250F vivid red 8.6R 4.2/15.2 24% 11.0 at the bottom
14 6F3D14 strong brown 6.0YR 3.0/6.2 3.4% 10.9 at the bottom
15 A0410C dark reddish orange 1.9YR 4.1/10.8 1.5% 10.0 in the centre
16 DA9D33 moderate orange yellow 9.4YR 6.8/9.7 0.5% 7.7 on the left
17 D05032 strong reddish orange 9.0R 5.1/12.3 0.3% 6.6 on the right
18 E25F0E vivid reddish orange 0.9YR 5.5/14.5 6.1% 5.3 in the centre
19 CE3223 vivid reddish orange 8.1R 4.5/14.2 3.6% 1.9 at the bottom right
20 C82A1C vivid red 8.2R 4.4/14.9 0.2% 1.5 at the bottom right
21 C73123 vivid red 8.2R 4.4/13.5 0.1% 1.4 at the bottom right
22 C72E22 vivid red 7.7R 4.3/14.0 0.1% 1.2 at the bottom right
23 C62616 vivid red 8.3R 4.2/15.0 0.1% 1.1 at the bottom right
24 EF6226 vivid reddish orange 0.5YR 5.8/13.9 3.4% 0.8 at the top right
25 D13521 vivid reddish orange 8.0R 4.7/14.9 0.7% 0.3 at the bottom right
26 CA3124 vivid reddish orange 8.1R 4.5/14.2 0.5% 0.3 at the bottom right

Colour name families

Family Area
orange 32%
yellow 25%
red 21%
brown 7.4%
olive 5.4%
gray 1.9%
olive black 1.5%
orange yellow 1.4%
white 1.3%
black 1.1%
olive brown 0.7%

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.211
Mean Local Roughness 0.024
Roughness Uniformity 0.019
Edge Density 0.143
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.199
Gradient Variance 0.045
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.009
Pattern Complexity 0.123
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.625
Spatial Variation 0.165
Texture Consistency 0.484

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.47
Brightness Variance 0.211
Brightness Uniformity 0.55
Brightness Skewness 0.239
Brightness Entropy 7.55
Rms Contrast 0.211
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.701
Mean Local Contrast 0.026
Contrast Uniformity 0.282
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.655
Shadow Percentage 32.949
Midtone Percentage 41.593
Highlight Percentage 25.458
Shadow Clipping 0.012
Highlight Clipping 0.007
Tonal Balance 0.211
Fine Contrast 0.013
Medium Contrast 0.032
Coarse Contrast 0.051
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.267
Edge Contrast 0.199
Contrast Clustering 0.516

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.762
Color Clustering 0.492
Color Transition Smoothness 0.517
Transition Uniformity 0.704
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.011
Mean Saturation 0.753
Saturation Variance 0.056
Low Saturation Ratio 0.103
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.096
High Saturation Ratio 0.801
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.946
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.999
Temperature Bias 0.993

Methodology

Computational analysis of a photograph of the artwork, reduced to 1,000 pixels on its longer side and filtered by a 3×3 median to remove grain. Colours: each pixel (sRGB rounded to 5 bits per channel) receives its Munsell notation and ISCC-NBS name from a table computed once from published data (Munsell renotation; ISCC-NBS blocks, NBS Special Publication 440, 1976), never from the artworks. Flat areas: connected regions of one name, merged with their neighbours while the CIEDE2000 difference between their mean colours stays below 10; an area is kept from 0.05% of the image; contrast with the surroundings measured 4 to 12 pixels from the edge. Texture: intensity standard deviation, local standard deviation, edge density (Canny), local binary patterns. Brightness: mean, variance, RMS, Michelson and local contrast, shadow / midtone / highlight distribution. Distribution: spatial coherence, transitions, saturation. Methods are deterministic and reproducible. Limits: the measurement concerns the photograph, including its lighting and white balance; two neighbouring areas less than 10 apart are merged.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2024). C Major - Research on Harmony - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0621.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/11/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

93d7df632c88461dcfed5159ba876c7d28dda30fa5b8fac495d446907cbaefdd

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français