AQC0711 | NAN-COL000009

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0711

A Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 3

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0711

Computational analysis of the photograph of the artwork A Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 3 (AQC0711) [1] by Arnaud Quercy [2], according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3], on an image 1000 pixels on its longer side, on 2025-10-03. Each colour is located in the Munsell system and named according to the ISCC-NBS system (267 names, National Bureau of Standards, 1976). The image divides into 32 flat areas. The largest are very pale purple (18%), blackish purple (13%) and dark orange yellow (11%). Among the others, those that stand out most sharply from their surroundings are blackish blue on the left (0.8%), very light purple in the centre (0.4%) and pale purplish pink at the bottom (0.7%). By colour name family: red 23%, pink 18%, purple 14%, yellow 10%, orange yellow 10%, blue 6.9%, brown 6.3%, black 5.8% and orange 4.4%.

Context

Analysis performed according to IDS-CMP-2025 [3]: (a) colours named by Munsell and ISCC-NBS, areas and flat areas, (b) texture, (c) brightness and contrast, (d) spatial distribution. Source image: 3024x4032 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-10-03.

A) Color Analysis

Flat areas

Ranked by contrast with their surroundings (CIEDE2000). Strokes thinner than 10 pixels are excluded (2).

Rank Colour ISCC-NBS name Munsell Area Contrast Position
1 262937 blackish blue 1.0PB 1.7/1.3 0.8% 57.6 on the left
2 E4C3E2 very light purple 7.3P 8.2/5.3 0.4% 40.6 in the centre
3 E8C3C8 pale purplish pink 7.1RP 8.2/4.1 0.7% 40.4 at the bottom
4 110D1A blackish purple 2.1P 0.4/1.3 13% 37.0 at the bottom
5 DEC0DE very pale purple 7.3P 8.1/4.1 18% 34.7 at the top right
6 EEC5D0 pale purplish pink 3.5RP 8.3/4.5 0.3% 34.3 in the centre
7 A26F39 brownish orange 6.2YR 5.0/6.5 3.8% 31.9 at the bottom right
8 C5343E strong red 5.5R 4.4/12.9 4.6% 29.8 in the centre
9 A92848 strong red 1.7R 3.9/11.6 9.4% 29.3 at the bottom right
10 D4B4A6 grayish yellowish pink 3.0YR 7.5/2.9 1.9% 28.7 at the bottom left
11 DC993C moderate orange yellow 9.0YR 6.8/9.4 1.5% 28.0 on the right
12 AB395A moderate purplish red 9.6RP 4.2/10.6 0.7% 27.7 at the bottom left
13 D8422B vivid reddish orange 8.2R 5.0/14.5 0.5% 26.6 on the right
14 DBB4B3 moderate pink 2.5R 7.6/3.7 0.8% 25.3 at the top
15 554F2F moderate olive 6.8Y 3.2/3.0 0.1% 23.9 at the bottom right
16 B7B6B7 light gray N 7.3/ 0.3% 21.5 at the top left
17 B28043 dark orange yellow 9.3YR 5.7/6.6 11% 21.3 at the top
18 C59642 dark orange yellow 0.4Y 6.3/7.4 0.6% 19.9 in the centre
19 C9313D vivid red 5.7R 4.6/13.6 8.2% 18.2 at the bottom
20 541D2C very dark red 3.0R 1.9/5.8 0.1% 17.7 at the bottom left
21 A66239 brownish orange 4.0YR 4.8/6.8 0.2% 16.1 in the centre
22 E9CACD light pink 2.2R 8.4/3.1 0.4% 15.4 in the centre
23 D2A44E moderate orange yellow 0.9Y 6.9/7.9 1.2% 15.1 at the top
24 D3657C deep pink 9.6RP 5.6/10.6 2.0% 14.1 in the centre
25 D7C292 grayish yellow 4.1Y 7.9/3.6 9.8% 14.0 at the top left
26 B67434 brownish orange 6.7YR 5.3/7.8 0.9% 12.5 in the centre
27 8C4436 moderate reddish brown 9.8R 3.7/6.7 0.8% 12.1 at the bottom
28 D5AA92 moderate yellowish pink 4.1YR 7.2/3.8 7.1% 8.6 on the left
29 E7AE64 moderate orange yellow 8.7YR 7.3/7.4 0.4% 5.8 on the right
30 CF8C8A dark pink 3.3R 6.4/5.8 0.1% 2.8 on the left
31 2D344B grayish purplish blue 6.1PB 2.2/3.4 0.4% 1.8 at the bottom left
32 0B090D black N 0.3/ 0.1% 1.7 at the bottom right

Colour name families

Family Area
red 23%
pink 18%
purple 14%
yellow 10%
orange yellow 10%
blue 6.9%
brown 6.3%
black 5.8%
orange 4.4%

B) Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.249
Mean Local Roughness 0.017
Roughness Uniformity 0.019
Edge Density 0.054
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.134
Gradient Variance 0.046
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.011
Pattern Complexity 0.119
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.623
Spatial Variation 0.198
Texture Consistency 0.594

C) Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.516
Brightness Variance 0.249
Brightness Uniformity 0.517
Brightness Skewness -0.401
Brightness Entropy 7.494
Rms Contrast 0.249
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.87
Mean Local Contrast 0.018
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.788
Shadow Percentage 22.525
Midtone Percentage 38.486
Highlight Percentage 38.989
Shadow Clipping 0.007
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.177
Fine Contrast 0.009
Medium Contrast 0.023
Coarse Contrast 0.033
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.282
Edge Contrast 0.134
Contrast Clustering 0.406

D) Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.764
Color Clustering 0.698
Color Transition Smoothness 0.662
Transition Uniformity 0.681
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.02
Mean Saturation 0.479
Saturation Variance 0.056
Low Saturation Ratio 0.299
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.462
High Saturation Ratio 0.239
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.671
Complementary Balance 0.037
Analogous Dominance 0.809
Temperature Bias 0.766

Methodology

Computational analysis of a photograph of the artwork, reduced to 1,000 pixels on its longer side and filtered by a 3×3 median to remove grain. Colours: each pixel (sRGB rounded to 5 bits per channel) receives its Munsell notation and ISCC-NBS name from a table computed once from published data (Munsell renotation; ISCC-NBS blocks, NBS Special Publication 440, 1976), never from the artworks. Flat areas: connected regions of one name, merged with their neighbours while the CIEDE2000 difference between their mean colours stays below 10; an area is kept from 0.05% of the image; contrast with the surroundings measured 4 to 12 pixels from the edge. Texture: intensity standard deviation, local standard deviation, edge density (Canny), local binary patterns. Brightness: mean, variance, RMS, Michelson and local contrast, shadow / midtone / highlight distribution. Distribution: spatial coherence, transitions, saturation. Methods are deterministic and reproducible. Limits: the measurement concerns the photograph, including its lighting and white balance; two neighbouring areas less than 10 apart are merged.

References

  1. [1] Quercy, A. (2024). A Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 3 - Catalogue Raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0711.html
  2. [2] Quercy, A. (2025). ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2662-7790
  3. [3] Quercy, A. (2026). Computational Image Analysis Standard. https://ideamorphism.org/en/measurements/2025/11/ids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-5dq9.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

e82bafb0f4db6097a63d1c7342120b834792fe79e7bbafee831a31a1987a44c5

This page in other formats

PDF · Markdown · Français